Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack's avatar

I appreciate your addressing this, Natalie. I find that in various spiritual spaces, folks (like me) who are lonely and don't fit into the mainstream of culture or religion congregate together. Receiving a flattering explanation of our situation (whether explicit or implicit), we are especially ripe to be fleeced into expensive retreats or manifestation courses.

At their most troubling, these teachers and spaces remind me a great deal of the institutional church I was brought up in, where the Truth was known to a select few, and a sense of being Elect was so intoxicating to some.

Community can be good, but when people herd up, it can also be unhelpful and even dangerous. I've been a lifelong "non-joiner," and while that has increased my feeling of isolation, it has also saved me from giving myself over to a teacher or group. Indeed, at times, a certain fervor is reached that repels me; it's like being sober in a room full of those who have been drinking for some time.

This happened recently. I couldn't understand what everyone was excited about - other than being excited together, in perceived opposition to societal control and norms. The teacher, whom I like a lot, was basically simply saying everyone has complete power to create his/her own life - with almost no detail or explication. Soon, the whole "room" was resonating with folks echoing, declaring complete sovereignty over all aspects of their lives. It felt like nonsense to me, and I quietly left, having an IRL meeting to get ready for.

Later, I wondered how the day went for the folks from that meeting, when the inevitable detours and setbacks of weather, relationships, health, etc. hit. But oftentimes, a built-in catch-all reason is defaulted to - something like failing to stay on a high-enough vibration, falling into old patterns, etc.

We, as people, surely need something to believe in - all the more when we are struggling. And we need to feel we belong, and that we matter. There's nothing wrong with these needs, but it's important, I feel, to keep them in mind, along with the knowledge that when we are hungry, we'll eat a lot of things, whether or not they are good for us.

Laura Creighton's avatar

Thank you for writing.

re: "The result is a sense of instant resonance, which tricks people into believing they’ve seen clearly when all they’ve done is felt deeply." I don't think that "feeling _deeply_ " is required. At least, I see a lot of this behaviour among people who aren't feeling deeply, but instead shallowly and sincerely. My conclusion is that a great many people who claim to be seeking 'authenticity' are really seeking sincerity. There are at least 3 big problems here. 1. Faking sincerity in a way that fools others is not particularly hard. Some charismatic people have a natural talent in this line, but even if you do not you can get most of the effect by practicing.

2. Feeling and Thinking are nor polar opposites. If you want to feel more deeply about something, you will have to put in more effort in thinking about the something. But people who identify with their feelings and try to not think too much about things end up beliving that the most sincere feelings are thought-free. The pinnacle is the infant screaming to be fed.

3. Some people's natural feelings about a matter are so shallow that if they ever manage to catch a feeling from somebody else, it feels deep to them. (This is what I think you are eluding to here). But it only seems deep to them because they can glimpse a bit of the deeper feeling that somebody else has done. This is not the same thing as having had the deep feeling yourself in your own mind. And it is utterly irrelevant as to whether the deeply felt thing is true. Sporting events often can make a crowd absolutely believe that the home team is going to score a goal right now. Everybody feels it. Strongly. But they only score one some of the time ....

57 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?